Describe the typical corrections workflow after an error is discovered.

• A. Update the online article, and document the change for transparency
• B. Notify editors, verify facts, issue a correction or clarification, update the online article, and document the change for transparency
• C. Issue a correction or clarification only
• D. Delete the article

Answer: (B)

When an error is found, a proper corrections workflow brings governance, accuracy, and transparency together. Start by notifying editors to trigger the standard process so the issue is handled consistently. Then verify the facts to understand exactly what’s wrong and how extensive the correction needs to be. Next, issue a correction or clarification that clearly states what was incorrect and what the correct information is, so readers aren’t misled. After that, update the online article so the corrected content is visible, and attach a formal correction notice that explains the change and its date. Finally, document the change to create an auditable record of what was corrected and why, supporting accountability and future reference. Deleting the article or skipping steps would hide the error or leave readers without a clear, traceable record, so they aren’t appropriate remedies.